Search for: "Reed v. Rule" Results 121 - 140 of 1,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On 17 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales and Burrows) granted the defendant in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP permission to appeal the order of the Court of Appeal dated 15 May 2020 ([2020] 3 WLR 838). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:31 am by Laura Orr
District Judge Rakoff ruled that the use by West and Lexis is fair use…. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:31 am by Laura Orr
District Judge Rakoff ruled that the use by West and Lexis is fair use…. [read post]
Lord Reed noted that this was contrary to the principle under UK administrative law that a statutory power must be exercised by the person on whom the power has been conferred (R v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison ex parte Hague [1990] UKHL 8 and Leech v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [1988] UKHL 16 cited). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
In the case of Derry v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The discovery rule pertinent to the statute of limitations was reviewed by the court in the case of Adams v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:13 am by Charles Sartain
Real author Paul Yale You’re in for a treat today; a report from my Gray Reed partner Paul Yale on the Texas Supreme Court decision, Yowell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
  [1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022]… [read post]