Search for: "Reed v. Social Security Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
See Shalala v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:15 am
Charles Binder said in an interview that, despite the small amount of money involved, the case was an important win for his firm because it was a rebuff to the "arbitrary" way the Social Security Administration treats attorneys and claimants. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The judgment was given by Lord Reed NPJ. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
Donovan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Reed is admitted to every federal district in Texas and is a recognized authority in representing claimants with Long Term Disability and Social Security Disability claims. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:23 am
There is an exemption for specific employee records, including “personally identifiable information” such as addresses, phone numbers and social security numbers. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Constitution’s equal protection guarantee to women in the landmark case Reed v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Cooperatives: the first social enterprise. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Overview The Security Services assessed that during Pham’s trip to Yemen, Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula trained him as a terrorist and he therefore became a threat to the safety and security of the UK. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Property rights and control of social groupings. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Though the law has survived innumerable attempts at repeal and administrative sabotage, its intransigent foes, prominently including the Trump administration, are still out to kill it in the courts, and the residual skepticism seeded by the misbegotten-birth narrative could help legitimate their aspiration that, this third, legally absurd, attempt might just succeed. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
K 564 C6 R438 2012 Making laws for cyberspace / Chris Reed. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Data Security Management in Digital Business, Oana Buzianu, Independent. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Mueller 15-574Issue: Whether the Social Security Act’s anti-assignment provision bars a state court from considering in any manner future Social Security payments in dividing marital property upon divorce. [read post]
