Search for: "Reed v. U. S" Results 41 - 60 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Reed, Morse v LoveLive TV US, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51481(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Dec. 15, 2020], considered Darcy‘s concept of “informal dissolution” and its implications for individual controller liability. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences; likely relisted after the January 24 conference)   Reed v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences) Reed v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1 and November 8 conferences; relisted after the November 15, November 22 and December 6 conferences) Reed v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by John Elwood
First up is Reed v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Last week, Federal District Judge Tanya Chutkan issued a preliminary injunction preventing the U. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The unanimous decision by Lady Hale and Lord Reed, R (Miller) v Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2)) breaks new and, in my view, shaky constitutional ground. [read post]