Search for: "Reed v. Unknown" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
After determining that the evidence Reed pointed to lacked credibility, the Court denied relief on Reed's Schlup v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
If, however, you and your business client are before an unknown or "strange" state court--and especially in state systems where judges are popularly elected--do get a jury. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am by Jonathan Glasson QC, Matrix.
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:54 am
Here's a guest blogpost, this time from Jaclyn Setili, an associate in Reed Smith's San Francisco office. [read post]
Lord Reed cites a nice example, Schmidberger Internationale v Austria (Case C-112/00) [2003] ECR I-5659. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Following Case C-410/11 Pedro Sanchez v Iberia where the ECJ asserted jurisdiction in interpreting the Montreal regime, and given the universally binding effect of the ECJ’s preliminary rulings on Member State courts, I suggested here that a hitherto unknown degree of consistency and predictability in the application of the Montreal Convention might be a possibility on the horizon. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am by Lisa Baird
While the full impact of this decision is currently unknown, it could have far reaching implications for global life sciences companies. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am by Michelle Yeary
  The Reed Smith half is involved in these cases and they ain’t saying a word (not out loud, anyway). [read post]