Search for: "Reel v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2018, 9:05 pm
In my new Cato piece, I welcome the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
Based on the Court’s decision in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:04 pm
In Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:58 am
In Runner v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:41 am
Employers are still reeling from last week’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:21 am
In McCormick v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
A previous post captioned “Texas Sales & Use Tax: no sales tax exemption allowed for purchases of reels on which a supplier delivered wire and cable to its customers” described the Texas Third Court of Appeals’ December 12th decision in Houston Wire & Cable Company v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
Apparently these things come in reels, like ticket reels, and work in machines specifically designed to fit the closures. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
Based on the Court’s decision in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:24 am
Reel-to-reel.JPG Seventh Circuit finds admission of DEA agent's post-indictment identification of drug conspiracy defendant did not violate the defendant's Fifth Amendment Due Process rights, despite the suggestiveness that might result from his knowing he was expected to identify the defendant's voice on the tape, because it was none-the-less reliable "under the totality of circumstances" since it was based on six hours of the agent's study… [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:16 am
Reel-to-reel.JPG Eighth Circuit rules that partially inaudible recordings with a confidential informant may be admitted when the trial court finds that they "provide [the] jury with the ‘gist' of the conversations" so that any inaudible portions do not "render" the tapes untrustworthy as a whole, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Immigration lawyers, reeling from yesterday’s defeat in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
The ALPR audit may take several months to complete, but we anticipate that the State Auditor will also make concrete recommendations for legislative reforms to reel in this controversial form of mass surveillance. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Appellate courts in California are definitely returning from vacation slowly.On the state side, today gives us (1) insubstantial edits to a prior opinion; (2) publication of a previously unpublished opinion (that simply does what the Ninth Circuit did in a prior unpublished opinion); and (3) a California Supreme Court opinion that affirms the Court of Appeal and agrees with the view of the California Department of Social Services in a welfare case.I'd say that none of those… [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:00 am
Enter: COMMIL USA, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:07 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gibson & Ors v Sheffield City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 63 (10 February 2010) Green v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 64 (10 February 2010) Online Catering Ltd v Acton & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 58 (10 February 2010) Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] EWCA Civ 66 (10 February 2010) Bascetta & Anor v Abbey National Plc [2010] EWCA Civ… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:23 am
No way says the New York Court of Appeals in its recent decision, Runner v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
July 28, 2023). 2Rod & Reel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
