Search for: "Reese v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-10591, involves a clash of titans like we haven’t seen since 1974’s Rumble in the Jungle:   It seems that Judges Posner and Wilkinson disagree on the interpretation of “sexual activity” in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
” The two-step test The Second Circuit adopted the “two-step” Second Amendment test created by the 3rd Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:05 pm by John Ross
Do foreign nationals have a due-process right to enter the United States to attend a civil-forfeiture trial involving their property? [read post]