Search for: "Reeves v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2009, 1:18 pm
We don’t usually cover gypsy & traveller planning permission cases, since they tend to turn on their own facts, but Rafferty and another v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2009] EWCA Civ 809 has one point of wider importance. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
Reeves III
U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) QD (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 620 (24 June 2009) P and P (Children), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 610 (24 June 2009) Reeves v Blake [2009] EWCA Civ 611 (24 June 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Johnson v MGN Ltd [2009] EWHC 1481 (QB) (24 June 2009) Marketmaker [...] [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Along the way, the Adelmann-Chester court cited Reeves v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:43 am
Reeves III
U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:38 am
May 30, 2008) (recognizing in dicta the manifest disregard standard); Reeves v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Wayne Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Most notably, in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
Reeves v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
App. 1994), and Reeves v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
App. 1994), and Reeves v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:19 pm
SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:30 am
Relying on Reeves v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 11:39 pm
Reeves v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:24 pm
Reeves v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
9 May 2008, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:34 pm
As we wrote in a prior post about the case of Reeves v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:05 am
The Lumpkin & Reeves firm, of Biloxi, has asked Judge Senter, in an abundance of caution, for clarification whether it can represent the plaintiffs. [read post]
