Search for: "Regents Of The University Of Michigan" Results 21 - 40 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by Joe Mullin
  The fifteen members of the University Technology Licensing Program are expected to be:  Brown University California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Columbia University Cornell University Harvard University Northwestern University Princeton University State University of New York at Binghamton University of California, Berkeley University of California, Los Angeles  University of… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:24 am by Tiffany Chiao
Jacob of the University of Michigan and Justin McCrary of the University of California at Berkeley—conducted an independent statistical analysis of the data for the Journal and came to a [...] [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:36 am by Mike Mireles
  The top 10 of the list includes: 1) The Regents of the University of California: 505 patents; 2) MIT: 278; 3) Stanford: 244; 4) Cal Tech: 201; 5) Tsinghua University/Graduate School at Shenzen: 181; 6) Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation: 168; 7) John Hopkins: 167; 8) University of Texas: 162; 9) University of Michigan: 142; and 10) Columbia University: 118. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
If you had told Student Althouse that one day she would be a law professor teaching about a Supreme Court case that said the University of Michigan regents violated the Constitution by doing affirmative action, it would have perplexed the hell out of her. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
" * * * The 2008 election temporarily ended the conservative Republicans' reign and dominance of the Michigan Supreme Court, paving the way for the 2010 opinion in University of Michigan Regents v. [read post]
At the core of this burden is the fact that, right now at public universities across Michigan, donors, athletic officials, religious organizations, and alumni have unfettered access to admissions committees and the Board of Regents to advocate that a university include their constituents in admissions decisions. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:37 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:05 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
On November 15, 2012, a deeply divided Sixth Circuit ruled, 8-7, that the measure violated equal protection under the political process theory because equal protection does not permit the kind of political restructuring that the measure affected (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan, 96 EPD ¶44,674). [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
You know, it was just a year ago that liberals were getting upset about Michigan taking a decision away from the state university's regents and putting it into the state law. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am by Bruce Khula
Regents of the University of Michigan, et al. (6th Cir., Case Nos. 08-1387/1389/1534 & 09-1111, Nov. 15, 2012) (PDF). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:50 pm by Sarah Lindsey
University of Michigan Board of Regents, 219 Mich App 679; 716 NW2d 1 (1996), which had addressed the University of Michigan’s gymnastics team. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
" The post Should Prominent Surgeon Be Able to Pseudonymously Sue University of Michigan for Allegedly Improper Suspension? [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Other universities defending IPRs are The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, and The Trustees of Colombia University. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:33 am
" The court rejected arguments by the University of Michigan Board of Regents, Wayne State University, Washtenaw County, Ingham County, and the City of Ann Arbor, holding that their recognition of domestic partnership agreements by employee and same-sex partners violates the constitutional prohibition against the recognition of nonmarital unions. [read post]