Search for: "Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wade--was a Burger Court decision, as was its compromise ruling on affirmative action, Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
Grutter also reaffirmed Justice Powell’s opinion announcing the judgment of a splintered Court in Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, the majority and Justice Kavanaugh in his concurrence make much of Justice O'Connor's statement that she expected race-based affirmative action to be no longer necessary in 25 years; but although reading that expectation as a rule of law would give the defendants until 2028, Chief Justice Roberts declares game over because the defendants represented that they did not think an arbitrary time limit was appropriate.In numerous other places as well, the Court selectively applies… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the 37 years since the Supreme Court decided its first major case concerning race-based affirmative action in higher education, Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by J. Gordon Hylton
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:25 pm
Rather, she noted that Grutter got to the Supreme Court 25 years after Regents of Univ. of Calif. v. [read post]