Search for: "Regents of University of California v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Ever since Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 446: There was a lack of substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the impacts to parks would be less than significant. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:25 pm
That is the case growing out of the Enron financial debacle, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
Regents of the University of California, 271 Cal. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:53 am
Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1132.) [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Regents of University of California (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1025 and Chawanakee Unified School District v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:22 pm
Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1129; Pub. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
At another level, such lawsuits (which are usually class actions) almost never articulate any credible basis that the plaintiffs suffered any actual harm.In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Regents of The University of California (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1043 is instructive. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are NOT punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:10 am
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are not punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 406, 407.) [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The Regents of the University of California (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226, and my 7/2/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Regents of University of California v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
16 May 2010, 3:00 am
Regents of University of California, [383 P.2d 441 (Ca. 1963)], to hold that a release from future liability, as a condition of admission to a charitable hospital, was invalid. [read post]
