Search for: "Register v. The Nature Conservancy"
Results 161 - 180
of 281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Read more and register here. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
In Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:00 am
Efploia Shipping, a Marshall Islands corporation based in Greece, was the technical manager of theM/V Aquarosa, a 33,005 gross ton newly built cargo ship, constructed in China and registered in Malta. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
Young v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
In Al-Bihani v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
He took part in the BBC’s live televised Tory leadership debate questioning the candidate on issues of islamophobia, which led to Boris Johnson agreeing to conduct a formal investigation into Islamophobia in the Conservative Party if he became its leader. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, of deference to administrative agencies’ interpretations of federal statutes. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The Representation of the People Act 1983 provided that a penal institution could not be regarded as a place of residence for registration purposes and individuals who were imprisoned could therefore not register as electors as they were not able to establish any other address for registration purposes.The Working Party considered that there was no argument of principle to deprive unconvicted prisoners of the franchise and recommended that… [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 3:40 am
(v) The Judge declared that the contract to sell the land to Level Holdings was unauthorised. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
The Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
