Search for: "Rego v. Rego"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 12:32 pm
In today’s case (Rycroft v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:47 am
Fannin, Respondents (FINRA Arbitration Award)Ronin Capital Hit With $500,000 in Compensatory Damages in Labor DisputeJames Rego and Robert Hill, Claimant, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
Alegações Onyx Lorenzoni e Rubens Bueno alegam que a liberação das testemunhas mencionadas contraria o disposto nos artigos 53 e 58, parágrafo 2º, inciso V, da Constituição Federal. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:35 am
jak Onassis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
And, despite her numerous complaints to “Rego,” the building’s superintendent, nothing was supposedly done to rectify the situation. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
Further Reading: Rego v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:23 am
Facts: This case (Andrews v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 8:16 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 12:07 pm
Here is an interesting 2017 opinion (People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
Prieston, Esq., Rego Park, for the Defendant. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
In a recent Ontario decision called Rego v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 3:45 am
Last week, I highlighted the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
(c) v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 3:39 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
In September, 2011, the Arrudas leased the store to Rego while maintaining ownership of the property. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
