Search for: "Reilly v. U. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
Mensch v Calogero 2023 NY Slip Op 33648(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155795/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
The Closure of the Salander O’Reilly Gallery In 2007, Salander O’Reilly Galleries was a high-profile gallery that had been in operation for over 20 years in New York. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
The Court went to lengths to present O’Reilly v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:28 am
S. 465, and Holland Furniture Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm
Data Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
O’Reilly v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
For example, Stanford hosted a July 2007 Pirate Party cash-preferred political fundraiser for anonymous donors that also had stops at the Googleplex[1] and the O’Reilly conference. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Peter Reilly. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
Borges v Placeres 2018 NY Slip Op 51622(U) Decided on November 2, 2018 Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County Ramseur, J. is unique in that one of the parties (not a lawyer-party) is trying to keep a legal malpractice case from commencing. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am
A more recent example of a Tax Court violation of judicial norms was revealed by Ballard v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Co. v Natl. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 5:55 am
Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Prima Vera, LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 32694(U) December 7, 2017 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 15-18431 Judge: David T. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:29 am
This blog post discusses Schwartz v Bourque, 2017 NY Slip Op 31621(U) (Sur Ct, Nassau County June 14, 2017), a recent decision involving an agreement to make a testamentary disposition as to a specific parcel of real property, a later agreement between the same parties concerning that property (that was alleged to have superseded the earlier agreement), and a deed transferring that same property which was contrary to the terms of the earlier agreement, but not the later one. [read post]
