Search for: "Reinhardt v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 7:33 am
Richter and Premo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
But neither Judge Reinhardt or Betty Fletcher was on the en banc draw. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals (which covers all of California) in Rizo v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:48 pm
[Ed. note -- Jon asked me to step in for a few days while he's out of the office.]United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 12:34 pm
The case, DC Comics v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
., the court will hear oral arguments in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:12 pm
The case is Conn v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 1:12 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Judge Reinhardt files an opinion concurring in the denial of en banc review. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
By doing so, the Ninth Circuit reaches the same result as the previous opinion penned by the late Judge Stephen Reinhardt before his passing in 2018, including overruling Kouba v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
By doing so, the Ninth Circuit reaches the same result as the previous opinion penned by the late Judge Stephen Reinhardt before his passing in 2018, including overruling Kouba v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:53 am
Dissenting, Reinhardt argues that the state supreme court's application of Enmund and Tison was contrary to federal law, and that its interpretation of the facts was unreasonable. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:51 am
To the tune of five different missives in Nelson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
It does so in two principal ways: first, by prohibiting the federal courts from applying the ordinary principles of stare decisis in deciding habeas cases involving prisoners held in state custody, thereby interfering with the federal courts' normal adjudicatory process; and second, by requiring federal courts to give effect to incorrect state rulings that, in the federal courts' independent judgment, violate the Constitution. [read post]
