Search for: "Remington v. Davis" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In particular, Holmes had already purchased a high-powered AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle, two tear gas grenades, a Remington 870 Express Tactical 12-gauge shotgun, and a Glock pistol. [read post]