Search for: "Remington v. Remington"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
The case is State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:05 am
As expected, gunmaker Remington has now filed a certiorari petition to the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2008, 8:13 pm
” Remington Arms Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Remington Arms Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
And if universities take the lead in responsible brand-building, perhaps they will set a good example for other commercial sectors in which goods and services are supplied under the limp banner of pathetic slogans that may mean a lot to their owners but which are rarely if ever considered to be brands or origin identifiers by the public at large.Merpel agrees: she recalls the admirable expression "limping trade marks", coined by Jacob J (as he then was) in Philips Electonics NV v… [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:10 am
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Kristin Hussey and Elizabeth Williamson report that the court “will consider this week whether to hear a case seeking to pierce firearm manufacturers’ legal immunity in the aftermath of shootings,” Remington Arms Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Remington Arms Co. (1972) 24 Cal.App.3d 711 (Kasel)). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:53 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Comcast v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:41 am
Scott Oswald argues that Comcast v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
" Under Kasel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Remember how Sir Robin Jacob characterised "limping marks" and got a bit of a ticking off from the Court of Appeal in Philips v Remington? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:43 am
Case citation: Lewis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
The Federal Court of Justice also refers to the corresponding understanding of the decision in re Improver Corporation v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Hoffman J), [1990] FSR 181 Rn. 289 of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales and confirms that German and English case law follow the same rules on this issue. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
Circuit (Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC v NLRB, April 8, 2014, Tatel, D). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:19 am
As the Fifth Circuit described in the seminal case of Matthews v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
Fyock v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
While noting the embarrassment and difficulty in commenting on your own cases, he explained that the difficulty with Kirin Amgen is that it is difficult to reconcile with the approach in Improver Corp v Remington Consumer Products Ltd [1990] FSR 181 - if it really all comes down to a matter of claim interpretation, then you don't need to go into the three Improver questions. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:32 pm
Corp., 342 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir. 1965); Remington Rand Bus. [read post]
