Search for: "Remington v. Remington" Results 81 - 100 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 2:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
Corp., 342 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir. 1965); Remington Rand Bus. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
  Carr J recalled that one of his concerns when he represented Philips in the Philips v Remington litigation was that three heads (on the Philips shaver) would be said to add substantial value. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Lord Justice Neuberger saw that, to determine what would amount to an 'immaterial' variation of the invention, it would be helpful to look at the three questions set out in Improver Corpn v Remington Consumer Products Ltd. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:17 am by Erica Vaccarello
  Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles,  C-361/15, on the irrelevance of the sector of use to determine novelty and individual character), but also 3d marks (cf. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am by azatty
Supreme Court’s historic ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
 As far as AG Whatelet requests that the indication of origin should be “without any possibility of confusion” he merely refers to the basic function of a trade mark as summarised in Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99, para 30) and Ansul v Ajax (Case C-40/01, para 36). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
  Of particular concern to readers of the COI Blog might be a decision handed down by the NLRB  in June – in Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC d/b/a The Sheraton Anchorage – finding that a generic conflict of interest policy in an employer’s handbook was unlawful under the Act. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:57 am by davidsontm
-          The famous REMINGTON mark is registered for guns, but also for similar clothing goods. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48This is an important case about whether drugs manufactured by Actavis infringe a European patent of Lilly. [read post]