Search for: "Rent v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 4,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Assn. v M.https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_04835.htm [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Given Pruneyard -- which, I get, was rendered in an era in which California courts were perhaps more strongly free speech oriented than today -- I think that the state court might well have been more solicitous of the state law constitutional claim than federal judges.Plaintiff can still take its shot in the United States Supreme Court, but I don't think that'll go anywhere. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:09 am by centerforartlaw
Belinda responded that her father was physically abusive towards her mother while the pair was married.[12] Even more shocking, she stated the abuse was “just one element of his 40-plus years of fraud and criminality. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:01 am by Amy Howe
His claims included an FTCA claim against the United States as well as a claim under Bivens v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Biden, 22-1225Issues: (1) Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONMatter of 495 Estates v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a party must allege that “(1) the attorneywas negligent; (2) the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of [the party’s] losses; and (3) [the party] suffered actual damages” (RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 231 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023], citing Excelsior Capitol LLC v K & L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:18 am by Amy Howe
The denial of review in North Carolina Farm Bureau v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 6:45 am by Giles Peaker
It was accepted in Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling [2001] EWCA Civ 1011 that a demand for and acceptance of a notice of increased rent created a new tenancy. [read post]