Search for: "Republican Party of Minnesota v. White" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
”  In 1923, a Minnesota trial judge reached the same result without a statute. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
These claims from Republicans only increased after Trump finally was banned after January 6. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said afterward that “we will look back on this day, V-Day, as a key moment in the fighback of this terrible disease. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by Richard Hasen
In her dissent in the 2002 case Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Rebecca Green
Blair that political parties may require electors to take pledges to vote for a particular candidate. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In part it was, as we say in the book, one of the Warren Court’s weapons against state criminal-justice systems that were engines of white supremacy or, at least, badly dysfunctional. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
President Andrew Johnson and his allies hoped to carry out a swift reconstruction, requiring only that southern states ratify the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, repudiate all war debts, and void ordinances of succession.17 The Radical Republicans, led by the “Dictator of Congress,” Rep. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
Senate in 2014 but lost out to the powerful Tea Party supported candidate Joni Ernst. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm by msatta
At Women Winning, a Minnesota-based organization dedicated to electing pro-choice women from all political parties to all levels of public office, we see this unprecedented national trend reflected in our work across the state. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
" The court below upheld this rule because it believed that "[t]he strict First Amendment framework of [Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]