Search for: "Res-Care, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 4,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
Res-Care, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:34 am
The Board reversed two refusals to register the mark ILEX, finding it not deceptive for (Section 2(a)) and not deceptively misdescriptive of (Section 2(e)(1)) "medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin paste for use by ostomy patients to protect the stomal region of the body and medicated skin paste for the treatment of diaper rash. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
In re Dynamic Edge, Inc., Serial No. 78760920 (June 5, 2008) [not precedential].Applicant's recitation of services was identical in part to the services in one cited registration, and its services were complementary to the software identified in the other registration. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm
” The following Code article, 2317.1, specifies the scope of premises liability for ruin, vices, or defects in property: “[t]he owner or custodian of a thing is answerable for damage occasioned by its ruin, vice, or defect, only upon a showing that he knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the ruin, vice, or defect which caused the damage, that the damage could have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable care, and that he failed to… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:57 am
In May, LHC Group Inc., a provider of home health, hospice, long-term care hospital and private duty services, entered into a purchase agreement to acquire assets of AseraCare Home Health. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The Denver Post reports that First American Residential Group Inc. terminated a $600,000.00 a year marketing agreement contract with Re/Max International Inc. after Colorado regulators questioned the legitimacy of their arrangement. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 11:12 am
In its opinion in In re California Naturel, Inc., the Federal Trade Commission held that the California Naturel, Inc. advertising promoting its “all natural” sunscreen on its website as containing “only the purest, most luxurious and effective ingredients found in nature” violated Section 5 and 12 of the FTC Act. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Jan & Gail's Care Homes, Inc., 242 Cal.App.4th 1133 (Dec. 7, 2015), a wage and hour case, the trial court denied class certification after holding that the plaintiff had not proven a uniform unlawful policy -- because the alleged policy was not unlawful. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:14 am
March 1, 2017 - 2 PM: In re Shawn Crenshaw, Inc.., Serial No. 86328394 [Section 2(d) refusal of the two-dimensional design mark, which includes the words OVATION FOR MEN, for "colognes and perfumes" [FOR MEN disclaimed], in view of the registered mark OVATION and OVATION-formative marks for beauty care products and cosmetics]. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:44 am
Patent RE 43,904 and RE 44,748 relating to healthcare provider reimbursement systems and methods. [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:11 am
" Conopco, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 3:31 am
RuizIn re: Mednax Services, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach LitigationMDL -2994Mednax (now called Pediatrix) is a company in the health care space. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:21 am
In re Spiritual Warrior Inc., Serial No. 88459695 (April 21, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:52 am
Oberg Industries, Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:47 am
Virginia Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Walter Reed Convalescent & Rehabilitation Center, Long Term Care of Tidewater, P.C. and Raina Winfrey, M.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Sys., Inc., 134 S. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:45 pm
La Rosita Fresh Market Inc., a Mt. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 5:31 am
Aetna, which also said it will cut health-care costs for many of the same employees next year, follows Gap Inc., Starbucks Corp. and others in raising the lower limit on workers’ wages.Aetna Chief Executive Mark T. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:53 pm
Who cares if there's a $73,000 fee award against the plaintiff? [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
Shareholder Litigation (merger transaction involving consideration of 33% cash and 67% stock did not trigger Revlon) with In re Lukens Inc. [read post]
