Search for: "Research Laboratories v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 5:46 pm
San Diego - The United States Supreme Court denied Barr Laboratories writ of certiorari on October 31, 2011 in Barr Laboratories v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
” In his dissent in New State Ice. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
BMS’s business activities in California are comprised of five research and laboratory facilities, 160 employees, 250 sales representatives, and a small state governmental advocacy office. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 3:56 am
The cooperation is based on a joint R&D cooperation agreement between the United States Department of Defense and the Estonian Ministry of Defence, signed in 2016, whereas the collaboration was initiated already in 2014 with the US Air Force Research Laboratory (USAFRL) with the idea of automating data exchange for cyber threats proposed. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
The main issue decided by the United States Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:13 am
Next week the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in a patent case styled Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:27 pm
Integra Lifesciences v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
Independent Laboratory Employee's Union, Inc v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:40 am
The recent report by the National Research Council of the National Academies, Strengthening Forensic Sciences in the United States: a Path Forward (2009) (NAS Report), confirmed what defense lawyers have long known: because forensic analysis is a product of human discretion, it is vulnerable to incompetence, error and sometimes even fraud. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Univ. of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
Under Chris Coons’ proposal, the most sensible business model is to do research outside the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:54 am
§ 271(e)(1) states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:04 am
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Accepts Appeal on Patented Medical DiagnosticsEarlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
These facilities consists of parallel processing laboratory, electronic laboratory, virtual reality laboratory, Information Technology Center, Institute’s construction and assembly plants, and a library.[10] ARI has been actively involved in the aerospace research at the national level as well as in establishing links and working relationships with relevant industries. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the appeal of Stanford University against Roche Diagnostics. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
By Jason Rantanen Cancer Research Technology Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm
Getting to the UNSC For years now, Russia has been complaining about US-funded biological research in former Soviet states. [read post]
