Search for: "Resnick v. Resnick"
Results 1 - 20
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 6:44 am
Supreme Court recently ruled in Murray v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:08 am
Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Harris v. [read post]
Two Pending Cases Before the U.S. Supreme Court Could Substantially Impact New Jersey Employment Law
2 Feb 2024, 8:05 am
The appellant in Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
More than a dozen years ago, Peter Mahler wrote about one such case, Barasch v Williams Real Estate Co. (33 Misc 3d 1219[A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:50 am
A professional-malpractice claim “may be based upon the creation of a loan document which is usurious and does not fall under any exceptions to the law of usury” (DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812 [2d Dept 2011]). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:19 am
Shaare Tefila Congregation v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:17 am
Supreme Court recognized sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:31 am
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
The court’s June 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
The Resnick Law Group represents workers in New Jersey and New York in a variety of employment claims. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:20 am
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:19 am
It cited a 1959 Supreme Court decision, San Diego Building Trades Council v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
The court ruled in the employee’s favor in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:09 am
The case before the Supreme Court, Murray v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Clinton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:17 am
” Resnick v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 6:27 am
The ruling in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]