Search for: "Resnick v. Resnick"
Results 21 - 40
of 249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 7:14 am
Woods v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
He discusses those views and Fisher v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:58 am
Resnick Manion Gaynor & Manning LLP (“MG+M”) has obtained a summary judgment on behalf of client HealthPort Technologies (“HealthPort”) in Basil Crookshanks, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 8:18 am
Legislator 1357 Ltd v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:20 am
Wingate v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida rendered a similar ruling in 2009, Double AA International Investment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida rendered a similar ruling in 2009, Double AA International Investment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:28 am
Condon Resnick, LLP, NY Slip Op 09259 (2d Dept. 2011).Here is the decision.Monday’s issue: The court’s granting relief. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
(treated as pretrial detainee) with Resnick v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:27 am
Condon Resnick, LLP 90 AD3d 809 812; Putnam County Temple Jewish Center, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:06 am
Resnick, 2007 Ohio 3717, 2007 Ohio App. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:17 am
” Resnick v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
., Appellants, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:42 am
Resnick v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
See Zuffa, LLC v. theultimatefighter.com, Case No. 10-cv-00582 (D. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:26 am
"Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the plaintiff raised an issue of fact as to whether the defendant's representation of the plaintiff until at least October 2007 reflected a course of continuous representation (see Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 977; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d at 812-813; Kennedy v H. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:21 pm
Last week, in Lewis v. [read post]
