Search for: "Resnick v. Resnick"
Results 41 - 60
of 249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 2:45 pm
DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:14 am
Resnick, 47 Cal. 2d 792, 796 (1957). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:01 pm
No, WDNY Judge Larimer, holds in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:19 pm
In Resnick v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:22 am
“Causes of action alleging legal malpractice which would otherwise be time-barred are timely if the doctrine of continuous representation applies” (DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
The Resnick Law Group represents workers in New Jersey and New York in a variety of employment claims. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Resnick, Esq. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:12 pm
Resnick, 2010 WL 2814414 (W.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
Andrew’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant engaged in a course of continuous representation intended to rectify or mitigate the initial act of alleged malpractice (see Melnick v Farrell, 128 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2015]; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812-813 [2011]; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:19 am
In addition, contrary to the defendants' contentions, the Supreme Court's decision in the underlying action did not utterly refute or conclusively establish a defense to the plaintiff's claim but, instead, merely disputed certain of the factual allegations (see DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am
It has included sexual harassment since the Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
The court ruled in Oncale v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:53 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in January 2016 in Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Easley v. [read post]
Two Pending Cases Before the U.S. Supreme Court Could Substantially Impact New Jersey Employment Law
2 Feb 2024, 8:05 am
The appellant in Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 7:52 am
Bus. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:30 am
As reported by attorney Vincent Antoniello with the Resnick Law Group, P.C., a lawsuit filed in New York state court against the Buffalo Bills, captioned Jaclyn S., et al v. [read post]
