Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause"
Results 81 - 100
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Additionally, evidence of employee support of at least 30% in the petitioned-for unit (the “showing of interest”) must be submitted simultaneously with the petition, along with the name and contact information of petitioner’s representative (whereas petitioners previously had 48 hours following the filing a petition to submit that information). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Billing Statements of Former Attorney Inadmissible in Counsel Fee Hearing In Matter of Denton v Barr, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5922992 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Divison modified an order of the Family Court which awarded petitioner attorney's fees of $110,000 and child support arrears of $11,000 to award petitioner $11,742 in child support arrears and $5,322 in interest on the arrears, and to remand the matter for clarification of the amount of… [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
Petitioner CCCR successfully challenged that 2010 EIR in court; in correcting its identified deficiencies, the City adopted a recirculated EIR (REIR). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
The trial court, following extensive briefing, issued a 74-page ruling denying Petitioner’s Petition, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
The medical examination was brief, and upon their return to the United States it was discovered that the children did, in fact, have significant medical and psychiatric problems. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
The photographer stated that the use of the photograph was humiliating and distressing, and caused her to become depressed. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environme [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
To put the dispute in context, a few words about trademark law are in order. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Petitioner/Appellant appealed, and the Court of Appeal reversed. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
United States (1971), the Court rejected a religious objection to fighting in what the petitioner viewed as an unjust war, even though the draft already recognized secular exceptions that allowed many others to avoid compulsory service. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Webb, No. 06-5806 An order denying a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus from a conviction for assault is affirmed over claims that judicial bias, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his invalid plea of guilty warranted reversal of the district court's decision. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
However, in a brief concurring opinion in Mahoney v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In 1991 they entered the United States on visitor visas and, after they overstayed their visas and the Immigration and Nationalization Service issued orders to show cause why they should not be deported, Arturas applied for asylum. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
It is also settled that the jurisdiction of Company Law Board or the Company Court can not be taken away upon showing the arbitration clause or the Agreement. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
