Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause"
Results 81 - 100
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Our government has both a responsibility and a right to protect this nation and its people from such threats. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The petitioners assert that marijuana’s Schedule I status is the only thing preventing courts from recognizing the defense, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The petitioners assert that marijuana’s Schedule I status is the only thing preventing courts from recognizing the defense, citing United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
United States, in which the Court appointed Jeffrey Sutton as an amicus to argue that the Court lacked (statutory) jurisdiction, since both the United States and the petitioner-defendant agreed that the Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
The court ordered the United States to pay Windsor a judgment in the amount of $363,053, plus interest and costs. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
§ 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
DEBRA COITO, Petitioner, v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
In Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) petitioner Kevin Lyon filed a Verified Petition for Return of Child to England and Issuance of Show Cause Order seeking the return of his three-year-old son, F.M.S.L., to England under the Hague Convention. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
In Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) petitioner Kevin Lyon filed a Verified Petition for Return of Child to England and Issuance of Show Cause Order seeking the return of his three-year-old son, F.M.S.L., to England under the Hague Convention. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply brief Adams v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Raffaela Wakeman of Lawfare discusses the government’s brief in opposition in the case of a Guantanamo habeas petitioner. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
We are further of the view that in order to ensure that the provision is not put to abuse at the instance of unscrupulous petitioners, the final order should be made only after notice to the Public Prosecutor. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Billing Statements of Former Attorney Inadmissible in Counsel Fee Hearing In Matter of Denton v Barr, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5922992 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Divison modified an order of the Family Court which awarded petitioner attorney's fees of $110,000 and child support arrears of $11,000 to award petitioner $11,742 in child support arrears and $5,322 in interest on the arrears, and to remand the matter for clarification of the amount of… [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Petitioner, a native and citizen of Indonesia, entered the United States in 1994 on a non-immigrant visa and overstayed his six-month authorization. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Taxpayers also argued that the judgment should be vacated under United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In 1991 they entered the United States on visitor visas and, after they overstayed their visas and the Immigration and Nationalization Service issued orders to show cause why they should not be deported, Arturas applied for asylum. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
5).Nothing appears in the record of this case that shows that the CFI questioned the credibility of the testimony of the petitioner or his witness during the hearing, nor the correction to the transcript presented. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Thus, it's even odder that the burden is placed on the defendant, since in most states, and certainly in the Third Restatement, an alternative design is an essential element of a design-related cause of action.Then the court really veered off. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
These activities caused VDO to sue petitioner for trademark infringement (the VDO suit). [read post]
