Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause"
Results 101 - 120
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The report showed that Rowe had spent approximately 29 [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Frank, No. 06-2725 Denial of defendant's application for release following an earlier conditional grant of habeas relief is affirmed where the district court complied with the circuit court's prior mandate and properly exercised its discretion in excusing a brief delay in the Pennsylvania state court system. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
United States, 15-5238, out of the way. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Raffaela Wakeman of Lawfare discusses the government’s brief in opposition in the case of a Guantanamo habeas petitioner. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The Petitioner is Teamsters Local 215. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
WETLANDS United States v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Neither party accepted responsibility. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Cash Biz .Also see --> Amicus Curiae Brief by Texas Appleseed in payday lender arbitration case in support of Petitioners (Borrowers)TEXAS SUPREME COURT OPINION IN HENRY V. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
The petitioner/defendant in Kokesh was an investment advisor who provided advice to business-development companies. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Taxpayers also argued that the judgment should be vacated under United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
The Office of the Solicitor General of the United States cited the article in its Bruen brief, regarding the University of Virginia's 1824 ban on firearms for students. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
Its presentation instead comprised only documents, portions of which were highlighted by the United States’ lawyers. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
For the alleged Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) violation for failure to immediately notify the National Response Center of the chlorine release, Norfolk Southern will pay a penalty of $32,500, to be deposited in the Hazardous Substance Superfund. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Our government has both a responsibility and a right to protect this nation and its people from such threats. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Further complicating this analysis is the fact that property values can change sporadically in relatively brief periods. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
We are further of the view that in order to ensure that the provision is not put to abuse at the instance of unscrupulous petitioners, the final order should be made only after notice to the Public Prosecutor. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In response, we reanalyze our data, separating the individuals from the corporations; in every case the re-analyzed data support the conclusions of our original paper to the same extent or more strongly. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
The agreement, lodged in federal court in Boston, resolves federal and state liability claims against 49 potentially responsible parties for the cleanup of the site. [read post]
