Search for: "Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 1:29 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), Revlon requires a board to make a reasonable effort to obtain the highest value for the company in a change-of-control context. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 2:27 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 50 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:35 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986) [see generally here] to maximize stockholder value in a change-in-control transaction. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:05 pm
As the Delaware Supreme Court put it in its seminal decision in Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm
See Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del.... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:13 am
In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:38 pm
Bainbridge In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:34 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), the Delaware Supreme Court explained that when a... [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:44 am
Here is the abstract:In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
The abstract follows: In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:48 pm
The abstract follows: In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
A seller choosing to hold an auction must carefully consider what the "rules of the game" will be. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:48 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), would not apply. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:37 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), and its progeny. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986), and its progeny. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:34 pm
" Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:39 am
In this Revlon Inc. v. [read post]