Search for: "Rhode Island v. Massachusetts"
Results 401 - 420
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Md. 1975), aff'd, 567 F.2d 269 (4th Cir. 1977).Massachusetts: Vassallo v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
These states are California, Colorado,Connecticut, Iowa, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
The States of Arizona, Maryland and Massachusetts also joined as friends of the court. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
Courts in Rhode Island, Oklahoma and Texas have ruled against such recognition. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
In short, the court declined jurisdiction because Rhode Island does not recognize same sex marriages.- Garry J. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:08 pm
The states with the highest percentages of Latino students attending highly segregated schools (90-100% minority) are: New York, Texas, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Arizona, Rhode Island, Florida, New Mexico, and Maryland.These rates of racial isolation are not inevitable. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:03 am
Ultimate’s van transported the party to a sports bar in Boston, then to a club in Rhode Island, and finally back to the same sports bar. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Hardman, No. 08-1342 Absent any allegation that state officials were used to enforce the process, Defendant was not transformed into a state actor for section 1983 purposes when he issued a subpoena commanding the Plaintiff to appear at a pretrial deposition, even though the subpoena was issued in his capacity as a notary public and in the name of the state of Rhode Island. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
The limo driver picked the men up at a bar in South Boston, where they had been drinking, and drove them to a strip club in Rhode Island, stopping along the way to purchase even more alcohol. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
In a noteworthy Clean Air Act decision in the wake of Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
The Mass. court found that as a result of Hernandez, same-sex marriage was "prohibited" in New York, as of the date of that decision, but since there had not been any ruling on the question in Rhode Island, couples from that state could obtain marriage licenses in Massachusetts. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
Ormiston which held that Rhode Island courts did not have jurisdiction to hear a divorce case between two people of the same-sex because the state did not recognize the marriage. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
The Rhode Island Supreme Court faced an analogous question, at least as it construed the issue before it, in its recent ruling in Chambers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Md. 1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1990).Massachusetts: Lareau v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:05 pm
In Chanbers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
But what about couples from Rhode Island? [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
As a result of that, and some litigation in the Massachusetts state courts, it seems that the only U.S. residents who have been allowed to marry in Massachusetts are Rhode Islanders (based on a possibly dubious interpretation of Rhode Island law by the Massachusetts courts) and a few New Yorkers who rushed in to marry in 2004 before state government threats to local clerks shut down that process. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm
Same-sex update: In a split decision, the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that Rhode Island courts are without jurisdiction to grant divorces to same-sex couples because when the legislature enacted the divorce statute in 1961, “marriage” unequivocally meant heterosexual relationships. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
(v) The tax brackets reported are for single individuals. [read post]
