Search for: "Rhodes v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm by Kenneth B. Weckstein
  Or, if you are a Navy employee in Newport, Rhode Island, you can file a grievance with the labor union and litigate it for seven years all the way to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:41 am by Record on Appeal
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court held in Palazzolo v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:16 am
United States, 429 U.S. 800, 813 (1976), which requires a party to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to prevail on a motion to abstain. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
P1–10–1155A (Rhode Island Superior Court 2012). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:09 pm
While most companies quit using asbestos in the 1970s and 1980s, it's a misnomer that its use has been outlawed in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm by Moll Law Group
Around 17,000 hernia mesh cases have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in federal court, while others are consolidated in state court in Rhode Island. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:03 am by Louis Pechman
Payment of overtime is not required for sales managers of banquet facilities, according to a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals in the First Circuit in the case of Leporacci v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Degirolami, (Religion and Human Rights 8 (2013)).Nora Abdul Hak & Hanna Ambaras Khan, The Application of Sulh in Resolving Community Disputes, (Paper presentation at in 1st World Congress on Integration and Islamicisation of Acquired Human Knowledge (FWCII-2013)).Susannah William Pollvogt, United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]