Search for: "Ricard v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
The case Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
I was gambling in Havana; I took a little risk: Pernod Ricard USA LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:20 pm
” So this was like Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
” They relied on Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:32 pm
In Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:32 pm
In Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
Rum production occurs throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, but it has been Cuban rum that has been the subject of decades'-long dispute, and two weeks ago, the subject a Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision in Pernod Ricard USA LLC v Bacardi USA, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
As stated by General Counsel for Pernod Ricard Ian FitzSimons following the Third Circuit's decision, "We are determined to continue to fight for fair competition in the United States market where ownership of the ‘Havana Club' trademar [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:59 am
Broomfield v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Pernod stated that should the American embargo be lifted, it would start selling a new rum under a new mark - Havanista: "In light of this decision, Pernod Ricard announces the registration of the trademark Havanista® with the USTPO. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
Euro-Pro invoked Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Cueto sued the French liquor company Pernod Ricard, who allegedly partnered with the Castro regime to distribute the Havana Club brand. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:38 pm
See Ricard v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
This decision, The Clorox Company Puerto Rico v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:13 am
Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]