Search for: "Ricci v. DeStefano"
Results 1 - 20
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 am
For example, in Ricci v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
DeStefano. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Yet while Merrill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:49 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:59 am
In 2009, in Ricci v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
Ricci v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In 2009, the late Justice Scalia observed, in his concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
Bollinger), race-conscious efforts to avoid discrimination against nonwhites (Ricci v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:22 am
The title of this post comes from this recent paper by Professor Richard Primus, the abstract of which states: When Ricci v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 9:52 am
The title of this post comes from this intriguing paper by Professor Samuel Bagenstos, the abstract of which states: At least since the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v DeStefano [92 EPD ¶43,602] controlled it’s analysis of the case, the appeals court found that the challenged plan was valid and that the plaintiff failed to establish that the Department’s justifications for the plan were pretextual (Shea v Kerry, August 7, 2015, 99 EPD ¶45,366). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Abstract below: At least since the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
” Adopting the position articulated in Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:18 pm
At first glance, this appears to be at odds with Ricci v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
A few weeks ago, the New York Court of Appeals became the first State supreme court to expressly import Ricci v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Ricci v DeStefano, ruling that “before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious, discriminatory action. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 1:09 pm
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Reva Siegel, the abstract of which states: Ricci v. [read post]
