Search for: "Rice v. Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
On 8 December 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of  Hwang v Kim [2021] EWHC 3327 (QB). [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 pm
In case we forget who they were, here is when Doriemus won the 1995 Melbourne Cup.This time around, the mother sought to knock out the father's application, based on the Rice and Asplund test, which was visited most recently in Miller v Harrington. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am by Mary Anne Peck
But with the case hanging in the balance, and the Supreme Court’s decision last year overturning Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
There were seven judgments handed down after full trials, only one of which concerned a claim against a mainstream media organisation: Dyson v MGN; Miller v Turner; Crobsie v Ley; Aaronson v Stones; LCG v OVD; Bekoe v Islington; Packham v Wightman and  Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Moderator: Jill Rhodes; Discussants: Judith Miller, Keith Lowry and Kathleen Rice [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
The judgment in David Miller v University of Bristol 1400780/2022, decided in February 2024, has been published. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm by INFORRM
On 28 July 2021, Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Miller & Anor v Turner [2021] EWHC 2135 (QB). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by Don Cruse
Previously: Four grants: disqualifying counsel; suing compounding pharmacies; government immunity × 2 (October 27, 2014) WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY AND GARY SPEARS v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Schachtman
Melnick, Donna Mergler, Albert Miller, Franklin E. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
That would be improper second-guessing of the trial court, the state supreme court said, relying on the strong deference the Supreme Court had commanded for habeas review in Rice v. [read post]