Search for: "Rice v. Department of Corrections" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29919-20 Hall v Express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication. 28851-20 Tomlin v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 27994-20 Odewale and Yadav v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 27841-20 Dainton v Bristol Post,… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am by Marty Lederman
The Department of Justice itself has suggested not. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18263-23 Wilson v Sunday Mail, 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), No breach – after investigation 19582-23 Understanding Animal Research v Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of a correction Resolution Statement – 21061-23 Benton v Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in Open Court and Apologies As mentioned… [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On 21 to 23 March 2022 Collins Rice J heard the defamation trial in the case of Sivananthan v Vasikaran QB-2020-002381. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am by Jeff Gamso
  You can't make us.California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation lawyer Benjamin Rice and the other states with foreign-bought sodium thiopental contend they aren't bound by the ruling made by a federal judge in Washington D.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2024, Collins Rice J heard the trial of Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan QB-2021-002658. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 20-24 June 2022, the trial in the case of Robert Lee v Vanessa Brown was heard before Collins Rice J. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 20 January Collins Rice J handed down judgment in Riley v Sivier [2021] EWHC 79 (QB), striking out Mr Sivier’s defence of truth, honest opinion and publication on a matter of public interest in relation to the comments, but it was struck out. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 5 July 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the the  privacy case of GUH v KYT [2021] EWHC 1854 (QB). [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Specifically, I believe that the majority's resolution of Filter's challenge to the Commission's recognition of local law, while reaching the correct result, is problematic.In The State Group Industrial (USA) Unlimited v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 09738-21 Woodcock v Huddersfield Daily Examiner, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09739-21 Woodcock v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigatio 09740-21 Woodcock v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09741-21 Woodcock v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09742-21… [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 31 October 2023 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Webster v HMRC. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
Interim findings of an independent analysis commissioned by the BSC department “suggest that there may be significant gaps were the Bill to proceed in its current form. [read post]