Search for: "Rice v. Railroad Company"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 9:10 am
Private pipelines: Eminent domain cannot be used for purely private use Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
Because of the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:35 am
And in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:20 am
In Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v Denbury Green Pipeline, issued on August 26, 2011, the Supreme Court of Texas apparently is following long standing public policy limiting pipeline companies to act in a capacity of a public use when acquiring property. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
The case, Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. and Mike Latta v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:36 pm
Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
" Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
Does this pipeline company — which agreed with the Railroad Commission to carry other people’s products as well as its own — qualify as a “common carrier” so as to be granted eminent domain powers under Texas law? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
90%); FRAUD & FINANCIAL CRIME (90%); COMPANY LIQUIDATIONS & ...... [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
Hassan Ali Rice Export Co. [read post]
