Search for: "Rich v. Walker"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 6:30 am
Powell, Jr.Anders Walker shows how a generation of scholars and judges has misinterpreted Powell’s definition of diversity in the landmark case Regents v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:30 am
Powell, Jr.Anders Walker shows how a generation of scholars and judges has misinterpreted Powell’s definition of diversity in the landmark case Regents v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:34 pm
In a complaint entitled “Terrorizing & Spying On Me” the JLR is requesting the court to “keep all Defendant’s from taking top secret Jonathan Lee Riches © files. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
By the close of business, Pacific time, the case will be in the hands of Judge Vaughn Walker. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:45 am
(With the limited exception of Cooper v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
District Court Decision: Perry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
Walker. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Too Many Riches? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
While the attorneys for the plaintiffs built a rich record with eight lay witnesses and nine expert witnesses, and using complex arguments based on civil rights cases of the past, such as Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:49 pm
– Jim Walker in his blog Cruise Law News Can I Get Rich from Spilled Coffee? [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
From the majority opinion, by Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, in Cargill v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
This Memorial Day we are once again firing up the grill with hundred dollar bills to celebrate how the ADA its current form encourages litigation that makes lawyers rich without any correspondening improvement in meaningful access for the disabled. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am
Notable Events of the Week: “A highly anticipated first summit meeting between President Biden and President Vladimir V. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:30 am
Walker’s decision in PERRY v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
” Jones v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am
Supreme Court decisions is Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Walker is a law professor at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm
The rounds continued to challenge participants as the night progressed, especially during the Supreme Court Audio Round, where everyone listened intently to Justice Ginsburg's timeless words, "make pot legal" and "bong hits for Jesus" while trying to name the court case they had been uttered during (Walker v. [read post]
