Search for: "Richard Gill " Results 101 - 120 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
  Manjit Gill QC opens his submissions on behalf of the AB Parties. 12.43: Is long established that Government cannot dispense with Parliamentary authority. 12.39: Helen Mountfield QC turns to 2015 Act. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “if the justices don’t reach a final conclusion” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
”The honourees are: Lance Sidney George Finch, Sandra Lynn Enticknap, Gordon Douglas Taylor, Herb Shurman Silber, Mary Elizabeth MacGregor, Patricia Jean Armstrong, Bernard Isaac Pinsky, Alan Arvid Frydenlund, Dennis Katsumi Hori, George Clement Gordon Proulx, Elizabeth Mary Vogt, David Michael Rush, Roxanne Patricia Helme, Nelson Ming-Yiu Tsui, Randall James Kaardal, Paul Rodney Ives, Helen Heiman Low, Margaret Ruth Sasges, Gurpreet Kaur Gill, Craig Andrew Boyd Ferris, Craig Patrick… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:07 am
Goodwin-Gill, Professor of International Refugee Law, University of Oxford (TBC). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the decision of the Barreau du Quebec sanctioning Gilles Doré for his incivility in writing a critical and intemperate letter to a judge. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Richards was prosecuted for having sex with an inmate in the jail laundry. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the grant in Benisek comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who notes “several differences” between Benisek and the court’s other pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “extraordinary developments in Wisconsin,” where partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of “the latest orders from the Court, and … a close look at Gill v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg suggests that “[c]ataloging some of the instances where courts incorporate math helps illuminate how the Court should proceed in Gill v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Hill, Jacqueline Thomsen reports that “[a] top sociology group fired back at Supreme Court Justice John Roberts for referring to sociology as “’gobbledygook’” during the oral argument last week in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:25 am by INFORRM
According to Guardian Lawyer Gill Phillips, the proposals do not go far enough. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes imagines a scenario in which “Justice Kennedy could still be line to write the  lead opinion in Gill [v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 5:46 am by INFORRM
Richard Drabble QC, seconding the opposition, reinforced some of Mr Mosley’s points before querying how a public interest would work in practice. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm by David Lat
The room was packed to the gills with libertarian or libertarian-leading luminaries, including but not limited to the following (in no particular order): Tim Carney, of the Washington Examiner, and author of Obamanomics (and also the brother of John Carney, former editor of ATL’s sister site, Dealbreaker); Julian Sanchez, Ilya Shapiro, and David Rittgers, of the Cato Institute; Dave Weigel, of the Washington Post; Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch, of Reason; Philip Klein, of the… [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Slate’s Amicus podcast features a discussion of Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At RealClear Politics, Matt Walter weighs in on Gill v. [read post]