Search for: "Richard D. Rogers vs State of Florida" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Rogers College of Law, Promotion of Drugs and Devices: Off-Label and No-LabelJason Smith, California State University, East Bay, Health, the First Amendment and the Ethics of the Patient-Physician Interaction Health Care Financing and Regulation Session 1B – Room 245Developments in Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity: Enforcement, Guidance and ImplementationModerator: Paul Lombardo, Georgia State University College of LawMelissa Alexander, University of Wyoming… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Fairbanks Scales Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D North Carolina: When an assignor is not stopped: Borgwarmer v Honeywell (Property, intangible) Bull in Bilski’s china shop: B of A’s financial instrument: Ex Parte Birle (12:01 Tuesday) District Court S D Florida: Court labels claims transformed in patent reexamination mere disguise: Aspex Eyewear v Marchon Eyewear (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court S D California:… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
The Turtles ongoing tri-state litigation against SiriusXM over the satellite radio broadcaster's refusal to pay to broadcast pre-1972 sound recordings reached the the Florida Supreme Court, who looked again at Judge Darrin Gayle's decision which found in favour of SiriusXM and agreed that "There is no specific Florida legislation covering sound recording property rights, nor is there a bevy of case law interpreting common law copyright related to the… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:15 am by Joshua Holt
Trivia: The novel upon which the film is based was written by John D. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]