Search for: "Richard Hasen" Results 321 - 340 of 695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that “the balancing test that the Court puts forward for when a special election should be held makes great sense, and will extend beyond the racial gerrymandering cases. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
” Ruthann Robson analyzes the opinion at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and at the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes and Justin Levitt do the same here and here, respectively. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:26 pm
"Disagreeing With Rick Hasen on the North Carolina Case": Richard Pildes has this post at the "Election Law Blog. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:20 pm
Hasen -- author of the "Election Law Blog" -- has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:36 am
" Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that "Supreme Court ruling wipes out Republican-drawn House districts in N.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
Commentary on the future of the court comes from Rick Hasen for Los Angeles Times, who suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts may become the court’s new swing vote, and Matt Ford for The Atlantic. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 9:04 am
Hasen -- author of the "Election Law Blog" -- has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Washington Post, Richard Hasen argues that Gorsuch “is an affirmative action baby,” but that “there’s no reason to believe that if he’s confirmed, his rulings on the high court would reflect the fact that he did not get where he is today solely based on his merits — or extend to others the benefit of a helping hand. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 11:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are several other tidbits on this issue: Richard Hasen’s “Neil Gorsuch got where he is because of a form of affirmative action. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the “$10 million effort to win … Gorsuch’s confirmation, funded by unknown donors to a conservative interest group called the Judicial Crisis Network,” observing that although “Democrats are in a lather over the ‘dark money’ campaign,” “there’s no evidence yet that it’s working. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Richard Wolf in USA Today, Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, Mark Walsh in Education Week, and Jurist’s Paper Chase blog. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Dionne at The Washington Post, Michelangelo Signorile at The Huffington Post, Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand at Slate, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog, and Carolyn Shapiro at the ACS Blog. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” A contrary view comes from Richard Pildes, also at the Election Law Blog, who considers “today’s decision a major new precedent with broad implications, not just for racial gerrymandering issues, but for partisan gerrymandering ones potentially as well. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
” Two more views: Rick Hasen, Richard Pildes. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:00 pm
"Why Gorsuch could lead court in wrong direction": Law professor Richard L. [read post]