Search for: "Richard v. Baker" Results 61 - 80 of 479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
Hadley Baker shared the House managers’ reply to the Trump brief. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
As the editor of the series, Geoffrey, congratulations on such an impressive array of books by everyone from Richard Epstein to Laurence Tribe and from Martha Nussbaum to Nadine Strossen. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The case continues and closing submissions will be heard on 19 November 2019 On the same day the Court of Appeal ((Lewison, Bean and Baker LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Euroeco Fuels (Poland) Limited and ors v. [read post]
We went back to the historical review of presidential impeachments written by Jon Meacham, Timothy Naftali, Peter Baker and Jeffrey Engel. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
According to Richard Scheffler, professor at UC Berkley, hospitals can also benefit from higher reimbursements for performing the same outpatient clinical services as independent physician practices, which can help offset the cost of acquiring them [11]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
According to Richard Scheffler, professor at UC Berkley, hospitals can also benefit from higher reimbursements for performing the same outpatient clinical services as independent physician practices, which can help offset the cost of acquiring them [11]. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm by David Post
  On July 24, 1974 a unanimous Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes in (the aptly-named) US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s ruling in Qassim v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp argues that “Justice Kagan’s vitriolic dissent last Friday in Knick was far wide of the mark when it lambasted the Court’s decision to overrule the oft-criticized Williamson County Planning v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re analyzes Monday’s opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
QUESTION: In your section on Richard Nixon’s 1968 presidential campaign, you write that “[n]o presidential candidate other than [Sen. [read post]