Search for: "Richard v. Social Security Administration" Results 41 - 60 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am by Richard Samp
But the statute also provides that an alien who is “lawfully present” in the country is eligible to receive Social Security benefits as well as benefits under the supplemental security income program. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
In this sense, one can understand standard setting as a mediator between the constitution of tech platforms and the objectives of national security, all within the constraints and objectives of the two greater domains of the Special Administrative Region and over all, the institutions and political-economic system of the nation. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
TITLE IIDEPARTMENT OF LABOREmployment And Training Administrationprogram administrationFor an additional amount for “Program Administration”, $5,000,000, t [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, the trial in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC began on Thursday 12 April 2018 before Mann J. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico Magazine, Richard Primus considers the implications of the decision in Masterpiece for Trump v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
 As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, in which the justices considered social security benefits claimants’ ability to scrutinize the data on which benefits denials are based. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Priess and Whipple discussed foreign policy challenges the Biden Administration has faced since January 2021, and more. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Security Council about how to respond to the Trump administration’s effort to reimpose sanctions on Iran. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am by Harvard Law Review
ICE/Homeland Security, 656 F.3d 221 (3d Cir. 2011). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill,” holding that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion, “as an invitation to agencies to make important decisions based on junk science, i.e., opinions of putative experts that are not supported by reliable data or analysis. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Anne Egeler
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]