Search for: "Richards v. Army" Results 61 - 80 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
“In December 1783, George Washington gave a toast at a dinner celebrating the formal dissolution of the Revolutionary Army. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade decision legalizing abortion will bring an army of Democrats to the polls — to the detriment of Republicans, particularly in the House. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:44 am by Jenny Gesley
Fragmented attempts to codify military discipline and principles of humanity had been tried in medieval and Renaissance times, for example by Richard II of England at Durham (1385), by Henry V of England at Mantes (1419), and by Charles VII of France at Orleans (1439), and in Scotland‘s Articles and Ordinances of War for the Present Expedition of the Army of the Kingdom of Scotland (1643), among others. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court held unanimously in Cyan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:17 am by Garrett Hinck
Army soldiers there and not the Peace Corps. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am by Lyle Denniston
”  It would happen in a case that was aptly named New York Times Co. v. [read post]