Search for: "Richards v. Wisconsin"
Results 21 - 40
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2022, 1:15 pm
Pablo v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Bill Baird remembers the events that produced Eisenstadt v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford LevinsonFirst things first: My deepest thanks to all of the participants in this panel, as well as to Ashley Moran, Richard Albert, and Trish Do, without whom it never would have happened. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Fitzgerald—in a federal lawsuit in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
Table 1: Revenue Impact of Federal Flavor Ban State Menthol cigarettes share of market Excise tax rate per pack of 20 cigarettes Total revenue decline Excise tax decline as percentage of total decline Alabama 42% $0.675 -$83,087,724 36% Alaska 24% $2.00 -$7,403,636 62% Arizona 26% $2.00 -$60,425,192 53% Arkansas 33% $1.15 -$52,609,248 44% California 27% $2.87 -$328,526,977 63% Colorado 24% $1.94 -$46,266,930 39% Connecticut 43% $4.35 -$80,529,512 78% Delaware 51% $2.10 -$30,932,062 81%… [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:03 am
In 1988, the Supreme Court in Mathews v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Evers, Dec. 3, 2020, and Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
" Applying this broad interpretation, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court held in Daniel v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
Richard. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:16 pm
Rev., no. 2 (Mar. 31, 2021) by PETER CARSTENSEN (UW Law) The Supreme Court recently heard arguments in NCAA v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Richard Clarke, commander of Special Operations Command; and Gen. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am
Degraffenreid (formerly Boockvar) and Corman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Justice Breyer’s majority opinion drew heavily on the approach that Judge Richard Posner had first applied in striking down a similar law in Wisconsin.[6]Judge Posner reasoned that the “undue burden” test the Supreme Court adopted in Casey required a comparative assessment of the benefits an abortion regulation conveyed and the burdens it imposed; how else was a judge to tell whether a burden was “undue”? [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
I then saw in the Wisconsin federal district court litigation that Trump v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm
” In 1960, however, Richard Nixon won both Florida and Ohio but still lost the election to John F. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
