Search for: "Richardson v. True"
Results 161 - 180
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"On a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, the court will accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" (Nonnon v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David… [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In his recent book, Vermeule suggests that the American doctrine of administrative law is shot through with moral principles, including deference.[8] Whether this is true is beside the point. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
[Update, December 16: Appalachian State repeated as national champion and won the game, 28-17, as Kevin Richardson ran for 179 yards and 4 touchdowns.]4. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
"It's a really compelling story," Mooney said of the book, Bloodsworth: The True Story of the First Death Row Inmate Exonerated by DNA. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
These assertions are both true. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am
Richardson, a semantic originalist would say that the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment was constant all along. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Session 3: Shaping an Overall Approach to ProtectionIntroductions: Jerry Reichman and Estelle Derclaye In what ways should different forms of protection be tailored to various types of subject matter (construed legally as forms of intellectual property, but also subject matter construed socially or commercially)? [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The search at Mar-a-Lago for classified documents is now presented as a tipping point, an existential threat to the country that true patriots must thwart. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Brian Tamanaha, Soliciting Nominations for the Cox-Richardson-Ruckleshaus Award (Mar. 15, 2006)22. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
