Search for: "Richmond v. Walker" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Anders Walker, Saint Louis University School of Law, has posted "To Corral and Control": Stop, Frisk, and the Geography of Freedom, which is forthcoming in the University of Richmond Law Review (May 2014). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  The first oral argument was in Walker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The appeals were heard by a seven justice panel of Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:44 am
Transit Authority RICHMOND COUNTYContracts Dating Service Violates Dating Services Law; Client Entitled to Refund of Membership Fee Robinson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:09 pm
  Authors include: Roger V Skalbeck, University of Richmond Law School. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 5:19 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
This discussion group will also address other issues related to reproductive rights, including Roe v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am by Madeline Reardon, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
The Supreme Court The appeal has been heard by Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
AND LARRY DALE WISENER; from Lubbock County; 7th district (07-06-00209-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-28-08)08-0288 RICHMOND CONDOMINIUMS v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
The Fab Five are Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance of Frognal and Lord Collins of Mapesbury, of whom one (Lord Walker) has served time on the Patents Court and another (Lord Collins) has presided over a pretty robust bit of patent litigation himself. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]