Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 181 - 200 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 4:24 am by Steve Shiffrin
Rick Pildes has an essay (here) which he discusses at Balkinization. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm by Justin.Levitt@lls.edu
But after Rick reports that Rick believes in instant-runoff voting, there's an explosion of IRV news and opinion and opinionated news. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am by Matthew Scarola
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes highlights the potential consequences of the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:42 am by Steve Bainbridge
So we were very intrigued by Rick Pildes' post linking the Supreme Court's decision in the PCAOB case to the structure of the Social Security Administration's chief actuary: Yesterday's NY Times carried a story about tensions between Congress and the Social Security Administration (SSA), along with tensions inside the SSA, over the critical task of how to keep the numbers concerning social security honest. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Here are additional early thoughts from David Zaring, Larry Ribstein, Megan McArdle, Rick Pildes, and Stephen Bainbridge (here, here, and here). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am by Steve Bainbridge
" Update: Rick Pildes comments that: The big battle over the "unitary executive branch" view has always been whether independent agencies are constitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Steve Bainbridge
The much vaunted challenge to the constitutionality of the PCAOB and of Sarbanes-Oxley itself has ended with a whimper rather than a bang. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am by John Elwood
Rick Pildes has an excellent post that is in a similar vein: I view Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion * * * as a symbolic victory for the “unitary executive branch” view of the Presidency, but as little more than symbolic. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm by Anna Christensen
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes praises the ruling as a positive outcome from the Court’s “first foray into the way changing technologies, the internet in particular, should affect the potential conflicts between democracy, the First Amendment, political participation, and privacy,” while Ruthann Robson offers an interpretation of the ruling’s implications at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Josh Blackman notes that the opinion reaffirms the importance of the… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Marcia Oddi
Election law expert Rick Pildes has a entry titled "The First Amendment, Direct Democracy, and the Risks of Technology: Today's... [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:37 am by Lawrence Solum
Rick Pildes has an excellent post on today's Supreme Court decision in Doe v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
  At Balkinization, Rick Pildes defends the relevance of Kagan’s academic experience. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm by Orin Kerr
” This picks up an idea that I think was first suggested a few days ago by Rick Pildes over at Balkinization. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes predicts that, if the Court strikes down the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Rick Pildes and David Golove have a calm, reasoned discussion at Balkinization on ways to deal with terrorism related detentions and trials. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:08 am by Rick Hills
I know that my post's title has a "dog-bites-man" blandness, but, in the context of our hyper-ventilated politics, it is downright weird to come across an analysis of the investigation and trial of suspected terrorists as calmly nuanced as today's post by Rick Pildes and David Golove over at Baliknization. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:16 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Update: In addition to John’s piece, Rick Pildes and David Golove have a calm, reasoned discussion at Balkinization on ways to deal with terrorism related detentions and trials. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:40 am by Rick Hills
As my colleague, Rick Pildes, noted on Balkinization, the SCOTUS may have exacerbated the financial crisis by allowing the OCC to bestow the boon of deregulation on banks through preemption of state predatory lending rules. [read post]