Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 201 - 220
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
” But as Rick Pildes says in Charlie’s story, it’s not likely in any event that courts are going to weigh in on the matter (As Jack points out below, the Kucinich suit is a non-starter). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes notes that this year marks Justice Clarence Thomas’s 25th anniversary on the court, and refers readers to an earlier symposium on Thomas’ jurisprudence. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
Re (@RichardMRe) October 2, 2022 Relatedly, there are Rick Pildes's and Orin Kerr's earlier posts about the concept of judicial courage. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:20 pm
Finally, Rick Pildes had a thoughtful op-ed yesterday in the Washington Post, arguing for time limits on detentions. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
But as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson accurate have pointed out, it's "separation of parties," not of powers, that define our system in most important respects. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm
” This picks up an idea that I think was first suggested a few days ago by Rick Pildes over at Balkinization. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Reacting to this report, Rick Pildes of Balkinization considers whether public financing of elections “actually encourages greater polarization, as seems to have been the case in [Arizona.] [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:31 am
" And, in a similar vein (though not with regard to the Establishment Clause), Rick Pildes has voiced the worry that "in the political realm, judges and others cling . . . tenaciously to the fear that too much politics, or too competitive a political system, will bring instability, fragmentation, and disorder. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:22 pm
And that's ignoring the point raised by Ornstein and Mann and explored by Rick Pildes in this excellent article, that our constitutional system is a rough fit with a Responsible Party Governance (RPG scholars like E.E. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
” Later, Rick Pildes offered a more favorable view of these legislative efforts as mere codifications of safeguards that the Department of Justice had already put in place via regulation. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
” Ruthann Robson analyzes the opinion at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and at the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes and Justin Levitt do the same here and here, respectively. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
” A contrary view comes from Richard Pildes, also at the Election Law Blog, who considers “today’s decision a major new precedent with broad implications, not just for racial gerrymandering issues, but for partisan gerrymandering ones potentially as well. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:06 am
Later in the interview I was asked about the prosecution’s theory and I expressed questions about it very much along the lines of Rick Pildes” Thanks for the clarification. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The story of the 2006 Amendments’ passage is fascinating and well told by Nate Persily and Rick Pildes. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
My sense (channeling my inner Rick Pildes) is that these burdens are as much expressive harms as real financial burdens: the federal government is sending a message that these covered states are less entitled to their full sovereignty than other states. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:20 pm
You can watch the event that I moderated, from UCLA Law’s Safeguarding Democracy Project, here: [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Rosalind Dixon and David Landau, Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy (Oxford University Press, 2021).Samuel IssacharoffAt first glance, the work of Ros Dixon and David Landau on constitutional borrowing appears to be centered on the role of constitutions and courts in securing or compromising democratic governance. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
I've expressed my skepticism in numerous places, but you can find a fairly concise explanation at pages 696-701 of this article in the Catholic Law Review, which reproduces remarks I delivered at a 2019 Federalist Society panel with Professors Sai Prakash and Rick Pildes, as well as Judge Thomas Hardiman and then-Judge (now-Justice) Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
An important amicus brief written by my colleagues, Rick Pildes and Sam Issacharoff, urges the SCOTUS to grant cert in the Siegelman case to resolve these perplexities of the Mail Fraud statute. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes maintains that “Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion … in Davis, striking down a federal criminal statute as unconstitutionally vague, bears a close relationship, which is likely to be missed, to his dissenting opinion last week on the delegation doctrine in the Gundy case. [read post]
