Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 241 - 257 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Steve Vladeck
As Rick Pildes wrote on Lawfare last August, the regulation made extensive departures from the structure of the Independent Counsel Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:21 pm by Nathaniel Persily
  And as Rick Pildes notes in his post, the geographic congruence of racial polarization and Section 5 coverage will certainly not be perfect, so even by that arguably irrelevant metric advocates would need to return to the larger questions as to how close the fit with Section 5 coverage needs to be.) [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm by Marty Lederman
On the other hand, as Rick Pildes has encouraged me to stress, there is certainly rhetoric in the majority opinion that reads the Elections Clause very broadly–indeed, in some respects, it is the high-water mark of the Court’s case law respecting that clause, hardly limited to the narrowest reading of the clause’s terms:  “The Clause’s substantive scope is broad,” writes Justice Scalia. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Here are additional early thoughts from David Zaring, Larry Ribstein, Megan McArdle, Rick Pildes, and Stephen Bainbridge (here, here, and here). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm by Sandy Levinson
In my interview with Scott Horton, I noted that I had not yet read Amy Gutmann’s and Dennis Thompson’s new book The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It (Princeton University Press, 2012). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes describes the decision as “a powerful example of what I call an ‘institutionally realist’ approach to judicial review of executive branch action. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am by Steve Bainbridge
" Update: Rick Pildes comments that: The big battle over the "unitary executive branch" view has always been whether independent agencies are constitutional. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:22 pm by Kenneth Anderson
In a conversation several years ago about what was then simply a hypothesized US military exit from Afghanistan, a friend told me, think of the CIA as the French Foreign Legion.   [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:22 pm by Kenneth Anderson
In a conversation several years ago about what was then simply a hypothesized US military exit from Afghanistan, a friend told me, think of the CIA as the French Foreign Legion. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:38 am by Jack Goldsmith
In this long post I analyze the Obama administration’s legal arguments for compliance with the War Powers Resolution. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm by Bob Bauer, Jack Goldsmith
  (Our analysis builds on the excellent work in the last few days by (among others) Matthew Seligman (see here, here, here, and here); Protect Democracy; Andy Craig; Derek Muller; Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Brad Smith, and Rick Pildes; and Henry Olsen. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:55 am by JB
Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have pointed out that our system is better described as separation of parties rather than separation of powers. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm by Joey Fishkin
On the face of it, what the Court did today in Shelby County seems more modest than what it might have done. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Putting together a list of all  law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
We offer this analysis, adding to the work of Professors Rick Pildes, Ned Foley, Derek Muller, and Rick Hasen (among others), as well as organizations including the Cato Institute, in an effort to bring more clarity to two topics that are now among the most urgent in election law. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
The afternoon session of Day 2 of the conference begins with introductory remarks from Gabby Blum, the moderator of the afternoon’s first panel. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” But I have also chided her for several years because of the title of a leading casebook—The Law of Democracy—that she co-edits with two other good friends whom I also respect greatly and, as with Pam, have learned much from over the years, Sam Issacharoff (a former colleague at Texas) and Rick Pildes. [read post]