Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 161 - 180 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 9:55 am by Keith E. Whittington
A bipartisan group of scholars -- Ned Foley, Mike McConnell, Rick Pildes, and Brad Smith -- published an op-ed laying out a good framework for reform. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Molly Runkle
Cox for Medium, Brady Zadrozny for The Daily Beast, Rick Pildes for Balkinization, Corey Brettschneider for The New York Times, Paul Kane for The Washington Post, Paul Callan of CNN,  Emily Crockett of Vox, as well as Sean Illing, Steven Ertelt of LifeNews, and Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:30 pm by Ross Davies
Meyer Debate on the Treaty Power, The Volokh Conspiracy, Jan. 13-Feb. 3, 2013, by Nick Rosenkranz, Eugene Kontorovich, Rick Pildes & Ilya Somin The Decision to Uphold the Mandate as Tax Represents a Gestalt Shift in Constitutional Law, Legal Theory Blog, June 28, 2012, by Lawrence Solum Asian-Americans, Affirmative Action, and Fisher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
  And at Balkinization, Rick Pildes warns that “when Presidents take on the Court, even in the mild form of criticizing the Court’s decisions, Presidents walk a delicate line. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
 Rick Pildes, the author of an amicus brief in the case, has a two-part analysis of the argument at Balkinization. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:45 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells Bennett, Two Thoughts on Syria and Kosovo Jack Goldsmith, George Friedman on Obama’s Bluff Jack Goldsmith, Secretary of State Kerry on UNSCRs and Legality Jack Goldsmith, General Dempsey on Syria Intervention Rick Pildes, Kosovo, Syria: When it Comes to Military Force, What’s the Proper Relationship Between Law and Political Judgment? [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Rick Pildes took issue with Alan Dershowitz’s recent argument that the President has complete control over all federal law-enforcement investigations, even those that impact himself and those around him. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am by John Elwood
Rick Pildes has an excellent post that is in a similar vein: I view Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion * * * as a symbolic victory for the “unitary executive branch” view of the Presidency, but as little more than symbolic. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Josh Wright
, PrawfsBlawg, Aug. 14, 2011, by Rick Hills Why John Edwards Probably Did Not Commit A Crime, Regardless of His Motives or Those of The Donors, Election Law Blog, June 4, 2011, by Richard Pildes Legal Theory Lexicon: Legal Theory, Jurisprudence, and the Philosophy of Law, Legal Theory Blog, Apr. 24, 2011, by Lawrence B. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm by Robert Chesney
  If you are going to be there, put the following on your calendar:  Friday January 4 2:00-5:00 Presidential Program, “Assessing the Future of International Criminal Justice: from Nuremberg to the ICC” (Rosedown, 3rd Floor, Hilton) Saturday January 5  7:00-8:30 Section on Constitutional Law – Breakfast session on presidential power in the Bush and Obama administration, featuring Professors Michael McConnell and Rick Pildes (Grand Salon 3&6,… [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
            Rick Pildes raises the related and important question of what legal elites care about, and he points out that the concern of these elites with the legal integrity of decision-making can lead Justices to take legal integrity into account. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:02 am
Rick Pildes writes a very good article on Sunstein's views on public policy and the law. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:58 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bob Bauer replied to Rick Pildes’ August 3 argument that a judicially enforceable codification of regulations on the DOJ special counsel would be constitutional. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Garrett Hinck
Rick Pildes proposed a slightly modified approach to protecting the Special Counsel that would allow judicial review of existing Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am by Guest Blogger
  The case, which Rick Pildes has blogged about here, presents the question whether Puerto Rico qualifies as a “separate sovereign” from the federal government for double-jeopardy purposes. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:59 pm by Joey Fishkin
This victory provides a new and cynical twist on the logic of what Daryl Levinson and Rick Pildes call “the separation of parties, not powers. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
  As a result, I have followed with great interest an ongoing debate about this issue, on The Volokh Conspiracy, between Rick Pildes and Nick Rosenkranz, with interventions by Ilya Somin and Eugene Kontorovich. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:50 am
An election law blog notes that my colleague Rick Pildes noted that the case illustrates the Court's trend away from the maximal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:37 am by Sandy Levinson
Madison was right in Federalist 51; it's simply, as Daryl (no relation) Levinson and Balkinization contributor Rick Pildes pointed out several years ago, that "ambition," in the modern American political system, is linked almost infinitely less to institutional loyalties than to partisan ones. [read post]