Search for: "Ricks v. Georgia" Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
But neither of the two missions the transatlantic alliance undertook in Afghanistan—the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Resolute Support—were Article V missions. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Georgia's ballot-access rules for third-party candidates are much more onerous for non-statewide candidates than for statewide candidates. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Instead, 1968 marked the first year of an unofficial moratorium on executions in the lead-up to the Supreme Court’s 1972 Furman v Georgia decision. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  He describes the questions raised by NAACP v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rick is surely right that a disputed presidential election in 2020 would be even more destabilizing than the divisive conflict that culminated in Bush v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Neumann Law Group
The largest sum — $1.9 million — was paid to the winning attorneys in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Neumann Law Group
The largest sum — $1.9 million — was paid to the winning attorneys in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:29 pm by Molly Runkle
Commentary comes from Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog, Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Libby Nelson of Vox, and Mark Joseph Stern of Slate, who also covered today’s opinion in Green v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]